There was once a woman who filed a malpractice courtship claiming that the CAT scan she received made her ineffectual to use her psychic powers … and she won ( well , sort of ) .
Judith Richardson Haimes once garner her living as apsychic , and was able to learn masses ’s halo and help police force clear criminal offence ( a truthful TV plot line ) . Haimes claimed that she could also carry seance and observe the past and future , while experience a psychical practice in New Castle , Delaware .
In 1976,Haimeswent to Temple University Hospital for a computed axile tomography ( CAT ) scan to notice the nature and case of tumors in her spike . While there , she warned the radiologist that she had had previous allergic reactions to iodine - based dye and therefore had been severalize to keep off these dyes . Apparently , the radiologist dismissed the warnings and suggest that they would experiment with a small amount of dye .
Once injected with the dye , Haimes very quickly went into anaphylactic shock and felt like her “ head was going to detonate ” . In the following days , she digest from acute sickness , vomiting , welt and hives , and intense vexation . The vexation seem to continue whenever she essay deep mental engrossment . After a yoke of months , the head ache were so drain that she had to close down her psychical business .
During the trial , Haimes ' teampresentedthe testimony of three law enforcement officers who claimed she helped work out their crimes .
When weighing the malpractice claim , the judgereportedly instructedthe jury not to debate her assertions about her psychical powers and the release of her practice in the call . Rather , they should solely focus on the damages from the supersensitive chemical reaction , such as weal , hives , and nausea .
So , the eight - person jury went away for 45 minutes . When they came back , it was adjudicate to award Haimes $ 988,000 ( $ 600,000 in damages and $ 388,000 in interest ) .
Of course , the hospital attorney were outraged following the finding of fact and argued that the panel had disregard the judge ’s instructions , and requested that the verdict be coiffe aside . The justice agreed on charm and denied the award as grossly excessive , ordering a new trial .
A 2nd trial was conducted in 1989 and the total case was dismissed , when it was ruled by a new judge that the plaintiff ’s aesculapian expert lack qualifications . This opinion was then affirmed by a disunite Pennsylvania Superior Court in 1991 .
So , despite originally winning nearly $ 1 million in damages , Judith Richardson Haimes never saw a unmarried cent of it , nor find adequate medical attention for her issues .
